Serghei Cozma Law Firm

3.1

5 ratings

Rate this place

Level 5 Local Expert

Dear review author, named Svetlana (for some reason, the lady does not indicate her last name, which indicates the anonymity of the review), I respect the right of every client to express his opinion on the quality of the legal services provided. At the same time, I consider it necessary to note that the information presented in the review is one-sided, contains a number of unsubstantiated and unconfirmed allegations, and does not fully reflect either the circumstances of the case or the work actually performed. Due to the requirements of the law and professional ethics, I cannot publicly disclose the details of the case entrusted to me, the contents of correspondence and other information constituting attorney-client privilege. Therefore, I do not consider it right to discuss the specific circumstances of the case in the public domain. At the same time, I consider it important to clarify the following. Significant legal and factual work was carried out as part of the assignment in the case of the division of inherited property, including an analysis of the composition of the inherited property and the question of whether there are grounds for including shares of a commercial bank in the estate, as well as a study of documents and circumstances relevant to determining the rights of heirs. Therefore, the statement that the obligations are allegedly "not actually fulfilled" does not correspond to the amount of work done and represents a situation solely on the one hand. I would like to note separately that before contacting me, the client had already managed to change five lawyers. By itself, this fact does not indicate that the client is right or wrong, but it is an essential circumstance for understanding the history of the relationship in the case and the reasons for disagreements with representatives. In the course of work, the client also demanded that certain actions be performed, which, in my professional opinion, could contradict the requirements of the law. I cannot and will not commit illegal acts, regardless of whether the client insists on them or not. Unfortunately, some of these demands were accompanied by harsh and insulting language directed at the lawyer. Professional disagreements are acceptable in themselves, but an offensive tone of communication cannot be a reason for a lawyer to violate the law or professional standards. "As for "working in the interests of opponents," "aggressive conversations," intentionally harming the interests of the client, and other similar accusations, they are not supported by any objective evidence in the review itself. The presence of correspondence by the author or the reference to certain witnesses does not in itself confirm the stated conclusions. I would also like to point out that a lawyer cannot guarantee a client a specific outcome of a judicial or other legal process. The lawyer's duty is to provide professional legal assistance, prepare a legal position and perform legal procedural and other actions in the interests of the client. I am ready to provide the competent authorities, the court or another authorized person with documents and explanations confirming the actual amount of work performed, if there is a corresponding legal need. I consider it incorrect to turn a public review into a means of putting pressure on a lawyer or to substitute an objective assessment of the services provided with subjective accusations that are not supported by established facts. At the same time, I respect the right of the reviewer to have his own assessment of our joint work. My professional position remains unchanged: a lawyer is obliged to act exclusively within the framework of the law, professional ethics and his powers.

See original · Русский

Светлана

Level 6 Local Expert

I signed two contracts with Sergey Kozma for the provision of legal services. 40,000 lei were paid under the contracts, and an additional 7,000 lei were transferred to cover expenses (state duty and courier). In fact, the obligations have not been fulfilled: the lawsuit has not been filed, the courier did not send the documents - he openly acted in the interests of his opponents - there are all correspondence and witnesses of his aggressive conversations. there are no expense reports. The contractor did not notify me about the refusal to initiate criminal proceedings and about the response from the tax service — I found out about them on my own. The text of the refusal contains a direct link to Sergey Kozma's explanations, given without my consent, which is actually used against my interests. During the interaction, the contractor repeatedly made disrespectful statements about me and got personal, which I consider unacceptable when providing legal services. In correspondence, he admitted that he did not understand how to act on the case, but did not give a meaningful answer to the question of why the contract was concluded and the money accepted. Currently, the contractor is not in touch, the funds have not been refunded. When choosing a lawyer, I recommend that you immediately record an action plan, deadlines, require copies of all documents and confirmation of each step, as well as pay attention to compliance with professional ethics in communication." Today is September 27 , 2026 . Because the Yandex platform.The reviews were created to reflect an exceptionally TRUTHFUL situation, and there is no technical button for a direct response to the performer's comment here, so I have to publish my official objection in the text of the review itself. 🔥🔥🔥I am deeply outraged by the total UNRELIABILITY of the words of the so-called lawyer Kozma Sergey. Your public attempt to justify yourself clearly demonstrates your complete professional incompetence and absolute ignorance of the laws.:You have directly violated Article 11 of the Law on Advocacy of the Republic of Moldova No. 1260/2002 by publicly disclosing the subject of attorney-client privilege (details of inheritance, mention of bank shares and the name of the client). 🔥You have committed public defamation (art. 70 Cod Contraventional al RM) by accusing me of "illegal demands" without proof. I remind you that all our correspondence has been preserved: my "demands" consisted solely of providing a written action plan, sending documents by courier and issuing me a legitimate fiscal check for 20,000 lei in cash, which you took and refused to declare. A legitimate audit of your sales register will quickly determine which actions are illegal here. As a lawyer, you don't know the basic things: You were given 7,000 lei to cover the costs of two court sessions (state fees), but you submitted documents for only one. 500 lei were transferred to you to pay for the courier, but you did not send anything anywhere. You are obligated to return these amounts withheld illegally. Moreover, you incompetently dragged me into a civil court, although this is illegal, since in a criminal case the entire amount of illegal enrichment is returned directly to the victim. Having caught you in these rude actions against my interests, I did absolutely the right thing by breaking the contract with you.Having five previous lawyers is a fiction. Your attempt to collect and publish gossip instead of submitting a lawsuit to the court only confirms the fact that you deliberately delayed the deadline in the interests of your opponents. The Decision of the criminal prosecution authority dated 09/11/2026 officially records your explanations given behind my back and to the detriment of my interests. The money in the amount of 40,000 lei for the unfinished work (including the expenses YOU have assigned ) must be returned to my account by tomorrow. I act strictly within the framework of the legal polar field. Screenshots of your response with the disclosure of attorney's secrets and defamation have already been attached to the materials of the official complaints. 🔥🔥Tomorrow morning they will be sent not only to the Ethics and Discipline Commission of the Bar Association of Moldova (Uniunea Avocailor din RM), but also to the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Moldova (Ministerul Justiiei) to take this situation under the highest state control and launch the procedure for revoking your license., The choice is yours

See original · Русский

Serghei Cozma Law Firm

2 reviews